| Market | Price | 24h | OI | Funding APR | Daily Long Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | $62,994 | −2.76% | $2.157B | +0.8% | ~$47K |
| ETH | $1,870 | −2.72% | $1.807B | +0.5% | ~$25K |
| HYPE | $52.34 | −4.56% | $1.167B | +0.7% | ~$22K |
Daily long cost = OI × (Funding APR / 365). Snapshot: 31 Jul 2026 20:18 UTC. Source: Hyperliquid API (metaAndAssetCtxs).
Based on $2.157B BTC OI. At +0.8% APR, longs pay 0.8% of what they would at a 100% APR market peak.
Perpetual funding is the price longs pay shorts to hold a position. When traders aggressively pile into leveraged longs, funding climbs — sometimes to 50–100% annualized — because shorts demand a premium to stay open against the crowd. The higher the funding, the more urgency is priced into the perp relative to spot.
With $2.157B in BTC open interest, longs are paying shorts roughly $47,000 per day in aggregate to maintain their positions. To put that in dollar terms: at 50% APR — a level seen in crowded-long peaks like Jan 2024 — carrying the same notional would cost longs roughly $2.96M per day. At 100% APR, it would reach $5.91M per day. Note that in practice, sustained high funding compresses OI as arb traders short the perp and buy spot until funding normalizes — so the comparison illustrates carry cost at a point in time, not a like-for-like scenario. At +0.8% APR, the carry signal registers near neutral.
BTC fell 2.76%, ETH 2.72%, HYPE 4.56% — all against a backdrop of market commentary citing rising real yields as a headwind for non-yielding assets (CoinTelegraph, 31 Jul 2026, citing US TIPS data). ARX notes that the BTC–real-yield correlation has been inconsistent across regimes; this framing reflects the market narrative at the time of this snapshot, not a causal claim.
On-chain, the perp funding picture is flat. One reading: sellers are reducing spot holdings rather than unwinding leveraged long perp positions. In a classic leveraged-long cascade, funding tends to run elevated leading up to the move (longs crowded in), then whipsaw toward neutral or negative as forced liquidations push longs out — though that pattern is not universal (trust-event liquidations like Nov 2022 did not follow the same sequence). Today, funding began and stayed near zero. The $5.13B combined BTC+ETH+HYPE open interest did not spike or collapse in the same window.
Other scenarios that also produce flat funding during a price decline: new short positions opening at roughly the same rate as long exits (netting to neutral), cross-venue arbitrage suppressing any downward funding spike, or leverage simply not being elevated coming into the move. Flat funding does not rule out any individual liquidations; it reflects the net positioning signal across the open interest. Read it as one structural data point, not a verdict on the cause of the move.
Want these reads 4× a day on Telegram?
Join ARX Signals →Not financial advice. Data sourced from Hyperliquid API (metaAndAssetCtxs). Macro context from CoinTelegraph (31 Jul 2026). Point-in-time snapshot, 31 Jul 2026 20:18 UTC. Past funding rates do not predict future rates.